Full Text
REGD. No. D. L.-33004/99
The Gazette of India
CG-DL-E-09042025-262391
EXTRAORDINARY
PART II-Section 3-Sub-section (i)
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
No. 183]
NEW DELHI, WEDNESDAY, APRIL 9, 2025/CHAITRA 19, 1947
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
NOTIFICATION
New Delhi, the 9th April, 2025
G.S.R. 222(Ε).—1. Under Rules 5 (i) and (ii) of Order IV, Supreme Court Rules,
2013 and Regulation 2 of the Regulations regarding Advocates-on-Record Examination
made thereunder governing the examination for Advocates-on-Record, it is hereby notified
for the information of all concerned that the next examination for the Advocates-on-Record
will be held at New Delhi on 16th, 17th, 20th and 21st June, 2025.
2. Advocates who have completed their training for a continuous period of one year
commencing from the end of the fourth year of date of their enrolment ending with the
30th April, 2025, or would complete their training before the commencement of the said
examination, shall be eligible to appear for the aforesaid examination.
3. Duly filled applications may be submitted in AOR Examination Cell i.e. Room No.
307, 3rd Floor, B-Block, Administrative Buildings Complex, Supreme Court of India,
New Delhi-110001 during office hours from 15th April to 30th April, 2025. For the
convenience of the candidates, copy of the Application Form along with
Instructions/Guidelines for submission of Application Form, has been appended to this
notification as Annexure-'A'. Physical copy of the Application Form may also be obtained
from AOR Examination Cell on any working day during office hours. No application shall
be accepted after the last date for receipt of applications i.e. 30th April, 2025 after
5.00 p.m.
4. Acceptance of the application is subject to production of requisite certificate of
completion of training from an Advocate-on-Record under Regulation 6 of the Regulations
regarding Advocates-on-Record Examination.
5. A list of leading cases with regard to Paper-IV (Leading Cases) is appended to this
Notification as Annexure-'B'.
6. Under Regulation 12 of the Regulations regarding Advocates-on-Record
Examination, no application/representation for re-evaluation of answer sheets shall be
entertained. Application/representation seeking relief other than in the nature of
re-evaluation shall not be entertained beyond a period of 30 days from the date of
declaration of the result.
7. In the ensuing examination, those who are given roll numbers and who absent
themselves in any individual examination paper(s) will be treated as not sufficiently
prepared for the examination and will be dealt with under Regulation 5(b) without giving
them any further opportunity, and they shall not be permitted to sit in any subsequent
examination except for good reason and with the express permission of the Board of
Examiners.
8. Under Regulation 11(iii) of the Regulations regarding Advocates-on-Record
Examination, a candidate who fails in all the papers of the examination shall not be
permitted to appear in the next examination.
9. The candidates, who do not appear in all the papers and fail in any of the papers in
which they have appeared, shall be treated to have failed in all the papers, including the
papers they have not appeared.
10. Under Regulation 11(iv) of the Regulations regarding Advocates-on-Record
Examination, a candidate shall not be allowed more than five chances to appear at the
examination. Appearance, even in any one of the papers in an examination shall be
deemed to be a chance. Those candidates who have already availed five chances are,
therefore, not eligible to apply for AOR Examination-June, 2025. However, vide Circular F.
No. 17/AOR Exam. dated 17.05.2024, the Advocates-on-Record Examination held in
December, 2021 shall not be reckoned as a chance while counting the permissible five
chances. Accordingly, as one-time relaxation, one more chance is permissible to the
eligible candidates on the basis of their result in the last examination they appeared at.
11. The Advocates-on-Record Examination - 2025, shall be conducted through Pen &
Paper mode only.
[F. No. AOR Exam./June/2025]
KUNTAL SHARMA PATHAK, Osd(Registrar) & Secy.
Board of Examiners Advocates-On-Record Examination
ANNEXURE- 'A'
LAST DATE OF SUBMISSION: 30.04.2025
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
APPLICATION FOR ADVOCATES-ON-RECORD EXAMINATION – JUNE, 2025
Το,
Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India
and His Companion Hon'ble
Judges ofthe Supreme
Court of India
The humble petition of
Affix recent
passport size
photograph
an Advocate,
S/o. / D/o. / W/o. Shri
most
respectfully showeth: (NAME IN BLOCK LETTERS AS PER ENROLMENT CERTIFICATE)
1. That I was enrolled as an Advocate with the Bar Council of
on
vide Enrolment No.
and that my name is still borne on
the rolls of the said Bar Council. (Self attested copy of Enrolment Certificate to be
attached)
2. That I have undergone training for one year under Mr./Ms.
Advocate-on-Record from
to
and/or my training will
be completing on or before 30.04.2025 and the Certificate of Completion of training has
been filed/is filed herewith/will be filed later before the commencement of examination.
OR
That I have been exempted from compliance with the Rules under Rule 5(ii) (c) (1) or
(2), Order IV of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 vide letter No.
3. That I have never been convicted of any offence.
OR
That I have been convicted of an offence under
and sentenced to
by
Court and the said conviction and
sentence has been stayed or suspended by
Court.
OR
That a period of two years has lapsed after I have served out the sentence/have paidthe
fine imposed on me. (Particulars of conviction and sentence and date of release or payment
of fine should be given).
4. That my date of birth is
5. That I desire to be registered as an Advocate-on-Record of the Supreme Court.
6. That I applied, but did not appear at the earlier examination(s) held in the
year(s)
vide Roll No(s).
7. That I appeared in the earlier examination(s), particulars of which are as follows:-
+-------+----------------------------+-----------+--------+
| S. No.| Year of the Examination(s) | Roll No. | Result |
+-------+----------------------------+-----------+--------+
| 1. | | | |
+-------+----------------------------+-----------+--------+
| 2. | | | |
+-------+----------------------------+-----------+--------+
| 3. | | | |
+-------+----------------------------+-----------+--------+
| 4. | | | |
+-------+----------------------------+-----------+--------+
| 5. | | | |
+-------+----------------------------+-----------+--------+
8. That I have been granted permission to re-appear under Regulation 11(i) / 11(ii) and,
therefore, will appear in Paper No.
OR
I do not wish to re-appear under Regulation 11(i) / 11(ii), and finally exercise option to
appear in the entire examination afresh.
9. That I am aware that after issuance of Roll No., if I absent myself in the examination
or in any of the papers, I will be treated as not sufficiently prepared and will be dealt
with under Regulation 5(b) without being given further opportunity, and that I shall
not be permitted to sit in any subsequent Examination, without prior permission of
the Board of Examiners.
10. That I, therefore, pray that Your Lordships may be pleased to permit me to sit in the tests
to be held by this Hon'ble Court in June, 2025 and I, as in duty bound, shall ever pray.
Signed this the
_ day of April, 2025.
Signature
Office Address:
Residence Address:
Mobile No.:
E-Mail ID:
(Write E-mail ID legibly)
Instructions / Guidelines for submission of Application Form for
Advocates-on-Record Examination-June, 2025
The aspirants for the forthcoming Advocates-on-Record Examination-June, 2025
are hereby informed that as an alternative to submission of the hard copy of the
Application Form for the said Examination, the scanned copy of the Application Form,
along with the requisite documents and the prescribed fee, may provisionally be
submitted through e-mail, subject to submission of the hard copy of the same to be sent
through post/courier.
The acceptance of the Application Form will be subject to the fulfillment of the
following conditions:-
1. (i) The applicant-Advocates who have completed/will be completing
continuous training of one year commencing from the end of the fourth year of
date of their enrolment ending with the 30th April, 2025, or would complete
their training before the commencement of the said examination, shall be
eligible to appear for the aforesaid examination.
(ii) Acceptance of the application is subject to production of requisite certificate
of completion of training from an Advocate-on-Record under Regulation 6 of
the Regulations regarding Advocates-on-Record Examination.
2. (i) The Application Form should be legibly filled and duly signed by the
applicant-Advocate.
(ii) All the fields mentioned in the Application Form have to be filled by the
applicant-Advocate. If any field is not applicable, the same may be struck out.
No material information should be concealed.
(iii) Incomplete/lllegible Application Form shall be summarily rejected.
3. One photograph has to be pasted at the designated place, i.e., on the top-right
side of the Application Form.
4. Self-attested and legible copy of the Enrolment Certificate has to be annexed
to the Application Form.
5. The applicant-Advocate has to ensure that he/she is eligible to apply for AOR
Examination-June, 2025 in all respects:-
(i) He/she has undergone one year of mandatory training and had furnished
prior intimation to this Registry.
(ii) Under Regulation 11(iii) of the Regulations regarding Advocates-on-Record
Examination, a candidate who fails in all the papers of the examination shall
not be permitted to appear in the next examination. Those candidates who
were declared to have failed in all papers of the last AOR Examination, in which
they appeared, are, therefore, not eligible to apply for AOR Examination-June,
2025 in view of those provisions.
(iii) Under Regulation 11(iv) of the Regulations regarding Advocates-on-
Record Examination, a candidate shall not be allowed more than five chances
to appear at the examination. Appearance even in any one of the papers in an
examination shall be deemed to be a chance. Those candidates who have
already availed five chances are, therefore, not eligible to apply for AOR
Examination-June, 2025. However, vide Circular F. No. 17/AOR Exam. dated
17.05.2024, the Advocates-on-Record Examination held in December, 2021
shall not be reckoned as a chance while counting the permissible five chances.
Accordingly, as one-time relaxation, one more chance is permissible to the
eligible candidates on the basis of their result in the last examination they
appeared at.
6. The scanned copy of duly filled Application Form with photograph affixed
thereon, along with the self-attested copy of the Enrolment Certificate, may be
sent through e-mail at advocate-on-record@sci.nic.in, subject to submission
of the hard copy of the same in AOR Examination Cell, Room No. 307, 3rd
Floor, B-Block, Administrative Buildings Complex, Supreme Court of
India, New Delhi-110001, latest by 5.00 p.m. on 30th April, 2025. Scanned
copy of the Application Form must be accompanied by the requisite documents
including fee payment receipt, failing which it is liable to be rejected.
7. For online payment, the applicant-Advocate is required to deposit the
prescribed examination fee of 750/- in the following Account:-
Account No.: 02070200016235
IFSC Code: UCBA0000207
Bank Name: UCO Bank, Supreme Court Compound, Delhi
8. After depositing the requisite examination fee (offline/online), the applicant-
Advocate is required to submit the hard copy of the following documents:
(i) Application Form, with one photograph affixed thereon.
(ii) Self-attested copy of Enrolment Certificate.
(iii) Receipt of payment of 750/-.
These documents should be submitted or sent by post/courier to “AOR
Examination Cell, Room No. 307, 3rd Floor, B-Block, Administrative
Buildings Complex, Supreme Court of India, Tilak Marg, New Delhi-
110001".
9. The final acceptance of the Application Form will be subject to the receipt
of the hard copy of the Application Form. The candidates may please note
that the submission of the soft copy of the Application Form has to be done
latest by 5.00 p.m. on 30th April, 2025. The last date for applying for AOR
Examination-June, 2025 is 30th April, 2025. The Registry will not be responsible
for any delay.
10. In case, at any stage, an applicant-Advocate is found to be ineligible to apply
for AOR Examination-June, 2025, his/her Application Form will be rejected.
REVISED LIST OF LEADING CASES
ANNEXURE - 'B'
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| S.No| Cause Title | SCR Citation | Equivalent citation in |
| | | | other journals |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 1. | His Holiness Kesavananda Bharati | [1973] Suppl. SCR 1 | (1973) 4 SCC 225 |
| | Sripadagalavaru v. State of Kerala | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 2. | Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India | [1978] 2 SCR 621 | (1978) 1 SCC 248 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 3. | Minerva Mills Ltd. & Ors. v. Union of India & | [1981] 1 SCR 206 | (1980) 3 SCC 625 |
| | Ors. | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 4. | Sharad Birdhi Chand Sarda v. State of | [1985] 1 SCR 88 | (1984) 4 SCC 116 |
| | Maharashtra | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 5. | A.R. Antulay v. R.S. Nayak & Anr. | [1988] 1 Suppl. SCR 1 | (1988) 2 SCC 602 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 6. | Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachillhu and Others | [1992] 1 SCR 686 | (1992) Supp 2 SCC |
| | | | 651 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 7. | Indra Sawhney and Ors. Etc. Etc. v. Union of | [1992] 2 Suppl. SCR 454 | 1992 Supp (3) SCC |
| | India and Ors. Etc. Etc. | | 217 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 8. | S.R. Bommai and Ors. v. Union of India and | [1994] 2 SCR 644 | (1994) 3 SCC 1 |
| | Ors. | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 9. | L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India and Others | [1994] 6 Suppl. SCR 261 | (1995) 1 SCC 400 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 10. | Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum v. Union of India | [1996] 5 Suppl. SCR 241 | (1996) 5 SCC 647 |
| | and Ors. | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 11. | D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal | [1996] 10 Suppl. SCR | (1997) 1 SCC 416 |
| | | 284 | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 12. | Mafatlal Industries Ltd. Etc. Etc. v. Union of | [1996] 10 Suppl. SCR | (1997) 5 SCC 536 |
| | India Etc. Etc. | 585 | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 13. | Vishaka and Ors. v. State of Rajasthan and Ors. | [1997] 3 Suppl. SCR 404 | (1997) 6 SCC 241 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 14. | Githa Hariharan and Anr. v. Reserve Bank of | [1999] 1 SCR 669 | (1999) 2 SCC 228 |
| | India and Anr. | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 15. | Rupa Ashok Hurra v. Ashok Hurra and Anr. | [2002] 2 SCR 1006 | (2002) 4 SCC 388 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 16. | Pradeep Kumar Biswas and Ors. v. Indian | [2002] 3 SCR 100 | (2002) 5 SCC 111 |
| | Institute of Chemical Biology and Ors. | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 17. | P. Rama Chandra Rao v. State of Karnataka | [2002] 3 SCR 60 | (2002) 4 SCC 578 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 18. | T.M.A. Pai Foundation and Ors. v. State of | [2002] 3 Suppl. SCR | (2002) 8 SCC 481: |
| | Karnataka and Ors. | 587 | AIR 2003 SC 355 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 19. | P.A. Inamdar v. State of Maharashtra | | (2004) 8 SCC 139 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 20. | Technip SA v. SMS Holding (Pvt.) Ltd. & Ors. | [2005] 1 Suppl. SCR 223 | (2005) 5 SCC 465 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 21. | M/s. S.B.P. and Co. v. M/s. Patel Engineering | [2005] 4 Suppl. SCR 688 | (2005) 8 SCC 618 |
| | Ltd. and Anr. | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 22. | Rameshwar Prasad & Ors. v. Union of India and | [2006] 1 SCR 562 | (2006) 2 SCC 1 |
| | Anr. | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 23. | I.R. Coelho (Dead) By LRs. v. State of Tamil | [2007] 1 SCR 706 | (2007) 2 SCC 1 |
| | Nadu | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 24. | Common Cause (A Regd. Society) v. Union of | [2008] 6 SCR 262 | (2008) 5 SCC 511 |
| | India & Ors. | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 25. | State of West Bengal & Ors. v. The Committee | [2010] 2 SCR 979 | (2010) 3 SCC 571 |
| | for Protection of Democratic Rights, West | | |
| | Bengal & Ors. | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 26. | Smt. Selvi & Ors. v. State of Karnataka | [2010] 5 SCR 381 | (2010) 7 SCC 263 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 27. | Re: Special Reference No. 1 of 2012 [Under | [2012] 9 SCR 311 | (2012) 10 SCC 1 |
| | Article 143(1) of the Constitution of India] | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 28. | Republic of Italy and Ors. v. Union of India and | [2013] 4 SCR 595 | (2013) 4 SCC 721 |
| | Ors. | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 29. | Novartis AG v. Union of India & Others | [2013] 13 SCR 148 | (2013) 6 SCC 1 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 30. | Dr. Balram Prasad v. Dr. Kunal Saha & Ors. | [2013] 12 SCR 30 | (2014) 1 SCC 384 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 31. | Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P. and Ors. | [2013] 14 SCR 713 | (2014) 2 SCC 1 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 32. | National Legal Services Authority v. Union of | [2014] 5 SCR 119 | (2014) 5 SCC 438 |
| | India and Others | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 33. | Pramati Educational & Cultural Trust ® & Ors. | [2014] 11 SCR 712 | (2014) 8 SCC 1 |
| | v. Union of India & Ors. | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 34. | M/s. Kailash Nath Associates v. Delhi | [2015] 1 SCR 627 | (2015) 4 SCC 136 |
| | Development Authority & Anr. | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 35. | Shreya Singhal v. Union of India | [2015] 5 SCR 963 | (2015) 5SCC 01 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 36. | Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record | [2015] 13 SCR 1 | 2016 (5) SCC 1 |
| | Association and Another v. Union of India | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 37. | Union of India v. V. Sriharan @ Murugan & Ors. | [2015] 14 SCR 613 | 2016 (7) SCC 1 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 38. | Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v. EMCO | [2016] 1 SCR 857 | (2016) 11 SCC 182 |
| | Limited & Others | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 39. | Mukesh & Anr. v. State for NCT of Delhi & Ors. | [2017] 6 SCR 1 | (2017) 6 SCC 1 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 40. | Excel Crop Care Limited v. Competition | [2017] 5 SCR 901 | (2017) 8 SCC 47 |
| | Commission of India and Another | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 41. | Common Cause v. Union of India and Ors. | [2017] 13 SCR 361 | (2017) 9 SCC 499 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 42. | Shayara Bano v. Union of India and Others | [2017] 9 SCR 797 | (2017) 9 SCC 1 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 43. | Justice K S Puttaswamy (Retd.), and Anr. v. | [2017] 10 SCR 569 | (2017) 10 SCC 1 |
| | Union of India and Ors. | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 44. | Common Cause (A Regd. Society) v. Union of | [2018] 6 SCR 1 | 2018 (5) SCC 1 |
| | India & Another | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 45. | Municipal Corporation, Ujjain and Anr. v. BVG | [2018] 6 SCR 861 | [2018 (5) SCC 462] |
| | India Limited and Ors. | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 46. | Shakti Vahini v. Union of India & Others | [2018] 3 SCR 770 | (2018) 7 SCC 192 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 47. | Navtej Singh Johar & Ors. v. Union of India Thr. | [2018] 7 SCR 379 | (2018) 10 SCC 1 |
| | Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 48. | Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) & Anr. v. Union | [2018] 8 SCR 1 | (2019) 1 SCC 1 |
| | of India & Ors. | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 49. | Jarnail Singh & Others v. Lachhmi Narain Gupta | [2018] 10 SCR 663 | (2018) 10 SCC-396 |
| | & Others | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 50. | Joseph Shine v. Union of India | [2018] 11 SCR 765 | (2019) 3 SCC 39 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 51. | Competition Commission of India v. Bharti Airtel | [2018] 14 SCR 489 | (2019) 2 SCC 521 |
| | Limited and Others | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 52. | Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Union of India | [2019] 3 SCR 535 | (2019) 4 SCC 17 |
| | & Ors. | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 53. | Ssangyong Engineering & Construction Co. | [2019] 7 SCR 522 | 2019(15) SCC 131 |
| | Ltd. v. National Highways Authority of India | | |
| | (NHAI) | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 54. | Dr. Ashwani Kumar v. Union of India and | [2019] 12 SCR 30 | 2019 SCC Online SC 1144 |
| | Another | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 55. | Rojer Mathew v. South Indian Bank Limited and | [2019] 16 S.C.R. 1 | (2020) 6 SCC 1 |
| | Ors. | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 56. | Central Public Information Officer Supreme | [2019] 16 S.C.R. 424 | (2020) 5 SCC 481 |
| | Court of India v. Subhash Chandra Agarwal | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 57. | Committee of Creditors of Essar Steel India | [2019] 16 S.C.R. 275 | (2020) 8 SCC 531 |
| | Limited Through Authorised Signatory v. | | |
| | Satish Kumar Gupta and Others | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 58. | M/s Shanti Conductors Private Limited v. | [2019] 16 S.C.R. 252 | (2020) 2 SCC 677 |
| | Assam State Electricity Board and Others | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 59. | Keisham Meghachandra Singh v. The Hon'ble | [2020] 2 S.C.R. 132 | 2020 (2) SCALE 329 |
| | Speaker Manipur Legislative Assembly & Ors. | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 60. | Sushila Aggarwal and Others v. State (NCT of | [2020] 2 S.C.R. 1 | (2020) 5 SCC 1 |
| | Delhi) and Another | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 61. | Dheeraj Mor v. Hon'ble High Court of Delhi | [2020] 2 S.C.R. 161 | (2020) 7 SCC 401 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 62. | Internet and Mobile Association of India v. | [2020] 2 S.C.R. 297 | (2020) 10 SCC 274 |
| | Reserve Bank of India | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 63. | Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal | [2020] 3 S.C.R. 1 | (2020) 8 SCC 129 |
| | and Others Etc. | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 64. | Madras Bar Association v. Union of India & Anr. | [2020] 2 S.C.R. 246 | 2020 (13) SCALE 443 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| NEWLY ADDED CASES w.e.f. 08.04.2025 | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 65. | Nandini Sundar v. State of Chhattisgarh | [2011] 8 SCR 1028 | (2011) 7 SCC 547 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 66. | Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar | [2014] 8 S.C.R. 128 | (2014) 8 SCC 273 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 67. | Abhiram Singh v. C.D. Commachen | [2017] 1 S.C.R. 158 | (2017) 2 SCC 629 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 68. | Neeraj Dutta v. State (NCT of Delhi) | [2022] 5 SCR 104 | (2023) 4 SCC 731 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 69. | Sukhpal Singh Khaira v. State of Punjab | [2022] 10 S.C.R. 156 | (2023) 1 SCC 289 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 70. | Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI | [2022] 10 S.C.R. 351 | (2022) 10 SCC 51 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 71. | Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India | [2022] 14 S.C.R. 1 | (2023) 5 SCC 1 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 72. | Shilpa Sailesh v. Varun Sreenivasan | [2023] 5 S.C.R. 165 | (2023) 14 SCC 231 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 73. | Kaushal Kishor v. State of U.P. | [2023] 8 S.C.R. 581 | (2023) 4 SCC 1 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 74. | Subhash Desai v. State of Maharashtra | [2023] 8 S.C.R. 857 | (2024) 2 SCC 719 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 75. | Cox & Kings Ltd. v. SAP India (P) Ltd. | [2023] 15 S.C.R. 621 | (2024) 4 SCC 1 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 76. | Interplay B/w Arbitration Agreements under | [2023] 15 S.C.R. 1081 | (2024) 6 SCC 1 |
| | Arbitration, 1996 & Stamp Act, 1899, In re, | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 77. | Article 370 of the Constitution, In re, | [2023] 16 S.C.R. 1 | 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1647 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 78. | Assn. for Democratic Reforms (Electoral Bond | [2024] 2 S.C.R. 420 | (2024) 5 SCC 1 |
| | Scheme) v. Union of India | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 79. | Kavita Kamboj v. High Court of Punjab & | [2024] 2 S.C.R. 1136 | (2024) 7 SCC 103 |
| | Haryana | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 80. | Sita Soren v. Union of India | [2024] 3 S.C.R. 462 | (2024) 5 SCC 629 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 81. | State (NCT of Delhi) v. BSK Realtors LLP | [2024] 5 S.C.R. 1159 | (2024) 7 SCC 370 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 82. | Mineral Area Development Authority v. SAIL | [2024] 7 S.C.R. 1549 | (2024) 10 SCC 1 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 83. | State of Punjab v. Davinder Singh | [2024] 8 S.C.R. 1321 | (2025) 1 SCC 1 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 84. | Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal | | 2024 SCC OnLine SC 3213 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 85. | Property Owners Association & Ors. v. State of | [2024] 11 S.C.R. 1 | 2024 SCC OnLine SC 3122 |
| | Maharashtra & Ors. | | |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| 86. | Tej Prakash Pathak v. High Court of Rajasthan | [2024] 12 S.C.R. 28 | (2025) 2 SCC 1 |
+-----+-----------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------+------------------------------------------+