Full Text
EXTRAORDINARY
PART I —Section 1
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY
No. 65] NEW DELHI, THURSDAY , MARCH 21, 2024 /CHAITRA 1, 1946
CG-DL-E-23032024-253357
MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY
(Directorate General of Trade Remedies)
INITIATION NOTIFICATION
New Delhi, the 21st March, 2024
Case No. AD(OI) -31/2023
Subject: Initiation of anti -dumping investigation concerning imports of “Aluminium foil” originating in or
exported from China PR.
F. No. 06/35/2023 -DGTR. —1. M/s Hindalco Industries Ltd., M/s Shyam Sel & Power Ltd , M/s Shree
Venkateshwara Electrocast Pvt. Ltd., M/s Ravi Raj Foils Ltd., M/s GLS Foils Product Pvt. Ltd., and M/s LSKB
Alumi nium Foils Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "applicants") have filed an application before the Designated
Authority (hereinafter referred to as the 'Authority'), on behalf of the domestic industry, in accordance with the
Customs Tariff Act, 1975 a s amended from time to time (hereinafter referred as the 'Act') and the Customs Tariff
(Identification, Assessment, and Collection of Anti -Dumping Duty on dumped Articles and for Determination of
Injury) Rules, 1995, as amended from time to time (hereinaft er referred to as the 'Rules'), seeking initiation of an anti -
dumping investigation by alleging dumping of "aluminium foil", originating in or exported from China PR
(hereinafter referred to as the ―subject country‖).
A. Product under consideration
2. The product under consideration in the present application is ―aluminium foil‖ (hereinafter also referred to as
"subject goods" or "product under consideration" or "PUC"), excluding the following:
i. Aluminium foil below 5.5 microns from China for non -capacit or applications. Aluminium foil for
capacitors applications, below 5.5 microns is within the scope of the product under consideration. This
was specifically excluded in the anti -dumping duty investigation conducted on ―aluminium foil 80
microns and below o riginating in or exported from China, Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia.‖
ii. Ultra -Light Gauge Converted foil meant for use in insulation, spices packing, thermal fluid lines covering
and tea bags application – Ultra Light Gauge Converted foil is an aluminium foil having thickness of 5.5
mic to 7 mic which and is backed with kraft paper & scrim, or glass cloth, whether plain or printed for use
in insulation, spices packing, thermal fluid lines covering and tea bags application.
iii. Etched or formed aluminium foils meant for Electrolytic Capacitor - Etched or formed aluminium foils is
aluminium foil meant to be used in the manufacture of Electrolytic Capacitor
iv. Aluminium composite panel meant for facade cladding and signage applications - Aluminium composite
panel is a non -aluminium core (often PE) bonded between two thin layers of aluminium, for use in facade
cladding and signage.
v. Clad with compatible non clad aluminium foil – Clad with compatible non clad aluminium foil is a
corrosion -resistant aluminium sheet formed from aluminium surface layers metallurgically bonded to
high-strength aluminium alloy core material for use in engine cooling and air conditioner systems in
automotive industry; such as radiator, condenser, evaporator, intercooler, oil cooler and heater.
vi. Aluminium foil for beer bottle – aluminium foil of 10.5 micron with rough surface and perforated whether
printed or not; to be used in beer bottle.
vii. Aluminium - manganese - silicon based and/ or clad aluminium - manganese silicon based alloys, whether
clad or unclad - with post brazing yield strength greater than 35 MPA, falling under tariff heading 7607 for
use in heat exchangers including radiators, charge air coolers, condensers, oil coolers, heater cores,
evaporators, heat ventilation and air conditioning (H VAC) systems and parts thereof.
viii. Adhesive tapes
ix. Colour coated aluminium foil
3. Aluminium foil is used extensively for protection, storage, and preparation of foods and beverages. It is used as a
packaging material, for conservation and preservation of edible and food products.
4. The product under consideration is classified under subheading 7607 of the Customs Tariff Act. Imports of the
subject goods are entering into India under the following codes 76071190, 76072090, 76072010, 76071110,
76071999, 76071991, 760 71995, 76071910, 76071994, 76071993 and 76071992. The customs classification is
indicative and is not binding on the scope of the product under consideration.
5. The applicants have proposed the following product control numbers (PCNs), in the application fi led:
SN Type of Foil Micron Range Bare / Converted
1 Alu Alu Stock 45-60 Bare Foil
2 House Foil 8 - 22 Bare Foil
3 Light Gauge (LG) 7 - < 20 Bare Foil
4 Medium Gauge (MG) 20-60 Bare Foil
5 Semi Rigid Container (SRC) 30 - 80 Bare Foil
6 Ultra-Light Gauge Bare 5.5 - <7 Bare Foil
7 Battery Foil 9 - 20 Bare Foil
8 Capacitor 4.5 - 20 Bare Foil
9 Any other Bare Foil (Not falling within 1 -8) Bare Foil
10 Cigarette Foil < = 7 Converted
11 House Foil Converted 8 - 22 Converted
12 SRC Converted 30 - 80 Converted
13 Medium Gauge (MG) Converted 20-60 Converted
14 Light Gauge (LG) Converted 7 - < 20 Converted
15 Battery Foil Converted 9 - 20 Converted
16 Alu Alu Converted/ laminated 45-60 Converted
17 Any other converted Foil
(Not falling within 10 -16) Converted
6. The parties to the present investigation may provide their comments on the PUC and the proposed PCNs,
within 15 days of circulation of the non -confidential version of the application filed before the Authority as
indicated in paragraph 25 of this initiation notification.
7. Interested parties may intimate their comments, if any, on the scope of the product under consideration, and
PCNs within 15 days of this notification. Any submissions in these regards should be duly supported with
verifiable documentary evidence. Any request for exclusion or inclusion of some product type should be
duly supported with verifiable documentary evidence of imports into India and absence of like article by the
domestic industry.
B. Like Art icle
8. The applicants have stated that there are no significant differences in the article produced by the applicants
and exported from the subject country. The article produced by the applicants and that imported from China
PR are comparable in terms of phy sical and chemical characteristics, manufacturing process and technology,
functions and uses, product specifications, pricing, distribution and marketing, and tariff classification of the
subject goods. The subject goods and the article manufactured by the applicants are technically and
commercially substitutable. The applicants have claimed that consumers of the PUC are using the subject
goods and the article manufactured by the applicants interchangeably. Thus, for the purposes of initiation of
the presen t investigation, the subject goods produced by the applicants are being treated as like article to the
product being imported from China PR.
C. Domestic industry and standing
9. Rule 2(b) defines domestic industry as follows:
'"domestic industry' means the dom estic producers as a whole of the like article or domestic producers
whose collective output of the said article constitutes a major proportion of the total domestic
production of that article, except when such producers are related to the exporters or imp orters of the
alleged dumped article, or are themselves importers thereof, in which case such producers shall be
deemed not to form part of domestic industry "
10. The application has been filed by M/s Hindalco Industries Ltd., M/s Shyam Sel & Power Ltd ., M/s Shree
Venkateshwara Electrocast Pvt. Ltd., M/s Ravi Raj Foils Ltd., M/s GLS Foils Product Pvt. Ltd., and M/s
LSKB Aluminium Foils Pvt. Ltd. The application has been supported by the following producers i.e. ESS
DEE Aluminium Ltd., Sparsh Industries Pvt. Lt d, SRF Altech Ltd., and Trefoil Packaging Pvt Ltd. While
Sparsh Industries Pvt. Ltd. is a new producer of the subject goods, ESS DEE Aluminium Ltd., SRF Altech
Ltd., and Trefoil Packaging Pvt Ltd., are establishing new production capacities and are yet to commence
production.
11. The applicants namely, LSKB Aluminium Foils Pvt. Ltd., Hindalco Industries Ltd., Raviraj Foils Ltd., M/s
Shyam Sel & Power Ltd ., and Shree Venkateshwara Electrocast Pvt. Ltd. have not imported the subject
goods from the subject country . However, GLS Foils Product Pvt. Ltd., has imported subject goods from
China. The applicants are also not related to any the importer or the exporter of the subject goods.
12. Since the production of the applicants account for a major proportion of the total production of the
subject goods in India, the applicants satisfy the standing and constitutes domestic industry within the
meaning of Rule 2(b) of the ADD Rules, 1995 and the application satisfies the requirements of Rule 5(3) of
the ADD Rules, 1995.
D. Subje ct Country
13. The subject country for the present investigation is China PR.
E. Period of Investigation
14. The applicants had initially proposed POI as 1st Oct. 2022 – 30th June 2023 (9 months) as the period of
investigation (hereinafter also referred to as 'POI'). The injury information has been provided for the POI and
three preceding years, i.e., 1st April 2019 - 31st March 2020, 1st April 2020 -31st March 2021, 1st April 2021 -
30th September 2022 (Annualised), and the POI.
15. However, the Authority has considered per iod of investigation (POI) for the present investigation is from 1st
Oct. 2022 – 30th Sept. 2023 (a period of 12 months) which is appropriate for this investigation. The injury
investigation period will cover the period of 2019 -20, 2020 -21, 1st April 2021 - 30th Sept 22 (annualized) and
the revised POI from 1st Oct. 2022 – 30th Sept. 2023 (a period of 12 months) .
F. Dumping margin computation
(a) NORMAL VALUE
16. The applicants have claimed that China PR should be treated as a non -market economy and the normal value
should be determined in terms of Rule — 7 of a Annexure I of the Rules. The applicants have cited Para 8(2)
of Annexure -I of the Rules and have stated that the Chinese producers should be directed to demonstrate that
market economy conditions prevail in the industry producing the subject goods in terms Para 8(3) of
Annexure -I of the Rules. The applicants have claimed that for China PR, normal value should be determined
in accordance with para 7 and 8 of Annexure I of the Rules.
17. The applicants have submitted t hat efforts were made to determine normal value on the basis of price or
constructed value in a market economy third country. However, the applicants could not get reliable
information regarding the same in absence of any publicly available information. Th e Authority keeping in
view the provisions under para 7 of Annex -1 of the rules, notes that imports into India from other countries
are either minimal or attracting duty.
18. Therefore, for the purpose of initiation of the present investigation, the normal val ue has been constructed
based on the estimates of the cost of production of the applicants duly adjusted with selling, general and
administrative expenses, along with a reasonable profit margin.
(b) EXPORT PRICE
19. The Authority has considered the CIF price of th e subject goods for the determination of net export price
(NEP). The Authority has, thereafter, made necessary adjustments to these prices to arrive at the ex -factory
price.
(c) DUMPING MARGIN
20. The normal value and the export price have been compared at the ex -factory level, which prima facie
establishes that the dumping margin is above the de minimis level and is significant with respect to the
product under consideration from the subject country. Thus, there is sufficient prima facie evidence that the
product under consideration from the subject country is being dumped in the domestic market of India by the
exporters from the subject country.
G. Allegation of Injury and Causal Link
21. The applicants have provided prima facie evidence with respect to the injury suffer ed by the domestic
industry because of the dumped imports. The volume of the subject imports from the subject country has
increased in both absolute as well as in relative terms. The capacity utilization of the domestic industry has
declined. While this is additionally because of new capacity additions, the domestic industry has submitted
that they would not have faced this decline in capacity utilization, had there been no dumping by the Chinese
producers. The price depression caused by the dumped imports have been preventing the domestic industry
from increasing its prices to recover the full cost and achieve reasonable rate of returns. The subject imports
have an adverse impact on the profitability parameters of the domestic industry due to which the cash profits,
PBIT and ROCE are negative in the POI. There has also been an increase in the inventory levels of the
domestic industry. Thus, the evidence provided by the applicants prima facie shows injury to the domestic
industry caused by the alleged dumped imports from China PR.
H. Retrospective imposition of duty
22. The applicants have requested for retrospective imposition of the antidumping duty by claiming the
following:
a. There is clear history of dumping of the product in the country. Not only there is history of dumping
from China.
b. The importers in India are aware of the fact that exporters practice dumping of subject goods into India.
The importers are also aware that such a practice would cause injury to the Indian producers.
c. The exporters have resorted to m assive dumping is well established by the fact that the dumping margin
has remained significant on monthly basis during the period of investigation.
d. The performance of domestic industry has steeply declined over the period of investigation.
23. The interested parties may offer their comments in this regard as per time limit given in this notification.
I. Initiation of the Investigation
24. On the basis of the duly substantiated application by the domestic industry, and having satisfied itself, on the
basis of prima facie evidence submitted by the applicants substantiating the dumping and consequent injury
to the domestic industry, the Authority hereby initiates an anti -dumping investigation into the alleged
dumping and consequent material injury to the domestic indu stry in accordance with Section 9A of the Act
read with Rule 5 of the Rules, to determine the existence, degree, and effect of alleged dumping and to
recommend the amount of dumping duty, which if levied would be adequate to remove the injury to the
domest ic industry.
J. Procedure
25. The principles as stipulated under Rule 6 of the AD Rules, 1995 shall be followed in the present
investigation.
K. Submission of information
26. All communication should be sent to the Designated Authority via email at email addresses jd12-
[email protected] and ad12 [email protected] with a copy to adv11 [email protected] . It must be ensured that the narrative
part of the submission is in sea rchable PDF/MS -Word format and data files are in MS -Excel format.
27. The known producers/exporters in the subject country, the government of the subject country through its
embassy in India, and the importers and users in India who are known to be associated with the subject
goods are being informed separately to enable them to file all the relevant information within the time limits
mentioned in this initiation notification. All such information must be filed in the form and manner as
prescribed by this initi ation notification, the Rules, and the applicable trade notices issued by the Authority.
28.
Any other interested party may also make a submission relevant to the present investigation in the form and
manner as prescribed by this initiation notification, the Rules, and the applicable trade notices issued by the
Authority within the time limits mentioned in this initiation notification.
29. Any party making any confidential submission before the Authority is required to make a non -confidential
version of the same a vailable to the other interested parties.
30. Interested parties are further directed to regularly visit the official website of the Directorate General of
Trade Remedies ( https://www.dgtr.gov.in/ ) to stay updated and a pprised with the information as well as
further processes related to the investigation.
L. Time Limit
31. Any information relating to the present investigation should be sent to the Designated Authority via email
jd12-dgtr@g ov.in and ad12 [email protected] with a copy to adv11 [email protected] within 30 days from the date on
which the non -confidential version of the application filed by the domestic indust ry would be circulated by
the Designated Authority or transmitted to the appropriate diplomatic representative of the exporting country
as per Rule 6(4) of the ADD Rules. If no information is received within the stipulated time limit or the
information rec eived is incomplete, the Authority may record its findings based on the facts available on
record and in accordance with the Rules. The time limits specified herein shall be for filing questionnaire
responses and any other information that an interested pa rty wishes to provide with regard to present
investigation. The Authority may reject any submissions that are filed after the prescribed time limits.
32. All the interested parties are here by advised to intimate their interest (including the nature of intere st) in the
instant matter and file their questionnaire responses within the above time limit as stipulated in this
notification.
33. Where an interested party seeks additional time for filing of submissions, it must demonstrate sufficient
cause for such extens ion in terms of Rule 6(4) of the ADD Rules, 1995 and such request must come within
the time stipulated in this notification.
M. Submission of information on confidential basis
34. Where any party to the present investigation makes confidential submissions or prov ides information on a
confidential basis before the Authority, such party is required to simultaneously submit a non -confidential
version of such information in terms of Rule 7 of the Rules and in accordance with the relevant trade notices
issued by the Au thority in this regard.
35. Such submissions must be clearly marked as "confidential" or "non -confidential" at the top of each page.
Any submission that has been made to the Authority without such markings shall be treated as non -
confidential information by t he Authority, and the Authority shall be at liberty to allow other interested
parties to inspect such submissions.
36. The confidential version shall contain all information which is, by nature, confidential, and/or other
information which the supplier of such information claims as confidential. For the information which is
claimed to be confidential by nature, or the information on which confidentiality is claimed because of other
reasons, the supplier of the information is required to provide a good cause sta tement along with the supplied
information as to why such information cannot be disclosed.
37. The non -confidential version of the information filed by the interested parties should be a replica of the
confidential version with the confidential information pre ferably indexed or blanked out (where indexation is
not possible) and such information must be appropriately and adequately summarized depending upon the
information on which confidentiality is claimed.
38. The non -confidential summary must be in sufficient de tail to permit a reasonable understanding of the
substance of the information furnished on a confidential basis. However,
in exceptional circumstances, the
party submitting the confidential information may indicate that such information is not susceptible to
summary, and a statement of reasons containing a sufficient and adequate explanation in terms of Rule 7 of
the Rules, 1995, and appropriate trade notices issued by the Authority, as to why such summarization is not
possible, must be provided to the sat isfaction of the Authority.
39. The interested parties can offer their comments on the issues of confidentiality claimed by any interested
party within 7 days from the date of circulation of the non -confidential version of the documents filed before
the Author ity as indicated in paragraph 25 of this initiation
notification.
40. Any confidential submission made without a meaningful non -confidential version thereof or without any
sufficient cause statement in terms of Rule 7 of the Rules and appropriate trade notice s issued by the
Authority on the confidentiality claim shall not be taken on record by the Authority.
41. The Authority may accept or reject the request for confidentiality on examination of the nature of the
information submitted. If the Authority is satisfie d that the request for confidentiality is not warranted or if
the supplier of the information is either unwilling to make the information public or to authorize its
disclosure in generalized or summary form, it may disregard such information.
42. The Authority , on being satisfied and accepting the need for confidentiality of the information provided,
shall not disclose it to any party without specific authorization of the party providing such information.
N. Inspection of Public File
43. A list of registered interest ed parties will be uploaded on the DGTR's website along with the request therein
to all of them to email the non -confidential version of their submissions to all other interested parties. Failure
to circulate non -confidential version of submissions might l ead to action under Section O of this initiation
notification.
O. Non-Cooperation
44. In case any interested party refuses access to and otherwise does not provide necessary information within a
reasonable period or within the time stipulated by the Authority in this initiation notification or subsequently
time period provided through separate communication, or significantly impedes the investigation, the
Authority may declare such interested party as non -cooperative and record its findings based on the facts
available and make such recommendations to the Central Government as it deems fit.
ANANT SWARUP, Designated Authority
Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi -110064
and Published by the Controlle r of Publications, Delhi -110054.
Login to read full text