Gazette Tracker
Gazette Tracker

Core Purpose

Initiation notification of an anti-dumping investigation concerning imports of Saccharin originating in or exported from China PR, by the Directorate General of Trade Remedies under Section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.

Detailed Summary

The Ministry of Commerce and Industry's Directorate General of Trade Remedies issued an Initiation Notification dated 26th March 2024 (Case No. AD(OI)-02/2024, F. No. 6/02/2024-DGTR) commencing an anti-dumping investigation into alleged dumping of Saccharin originating in or exported from China PR, classified under customs subheading 29251100 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, following an application by domestic producers Swati Petro Products Ltd. and Blue Jet Healthcare Ltd. under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment, and Collection of Anti-Dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995. The Authority found the applicants constitute an eligible domestic industry under Rule 2(b) and satisfy standing under Rule 5(3), noting two other domestic producers, A. S. Chemopharma Pvt. Ltd. and Shree Vardayini Chemical Industries Pvt Ltd. The period of investigation is October 2022 to September 2023, with the injury investigation period covering 2020-21, 2021-22 and 2022-23; normal value for China PR is to be constructed under Rule 7/Para 8 of Annexure I on the basis that China PR should be treated as a non-market economy, while export price is computed from Directorate General of Systems & Data Management transaction-wise import data. The investigation is initiated under Section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act read with Rule 5 of the Rules, and interested parties must submit information within thirty days to the Authority at [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] and [email protected], with confidential submissions requiring a non-confidential version under Rule 8(2). The notification is signed by Anant Swarup, Designated Authority.

Full Text

EXTRAORDINARY PART I —Section 1 PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY No. 72] NEW DELHI, TUES DAY , MARCH 2 6, 2024 /CHAITRA 6, 194 6 CG-DL-E-27032024-253389 MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY (Directorate General of Trade Remedies) INITIATION NOTIFICATION New Delhi, the 2 6th March , 2024 (Case No. AD(OI) - 02/2024) Subject: Initiation of anti -dumping investigation concerning imports of “Saccharin” originating in or exported from China PR F. No. 6/02/2024 -DGTR. —1. M/s. Swati Petro Products Ltd. and M/s. Blue Jet Healthcare Ltd. (hereina fter collectively referred to as applicants) have filed an application before the Designated Authority (hereinafter referred to as the "Authority") under the provisions of the Customs Tariff Act 1975, as amended from time to time (hereinafter also referred to as the "Act") and the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment, and Collection of Anti -Dumping Duty on dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995, as amended from time to time (hereinafter referred to as the 'Rules'), seeking initia tion of an anti -dumping investigation by alleging dumping of "Saccharin", originating in or exported from China PR (hereinafter referred to as the “subject country”). A. PRODUCT UNDER CONSIDERATION 2. The product under consideration is the “Saccharin” hereinafte r also referred to as "subject goods" or "product under consideration" or "PUC"). 3. Saccharin is a non -nutritive sweetener and considered to be low calorie substitute for cane sugar. Primarily there are two types of saccharin i.e. soluble and insoluble. In m arket parlance soluble saccharin is called sodium saccharin whereas insoluble saccharin is called saccharin or saccharin acid. Saccharin is produced in two physical forms, viz. granular and powder. Sodium saccharin in granular form is used in situations wh ere saccharin will be dissolved, the powder form which has been grounded and spray dried is used in dry mixes and pharmaceuticals. It is slightly soluble in water. Insoluble form of saccharin is used in many pharmaceutical and medical applications. Sacchar in is used in a variety of industry such as food and beverage, personal care products, tabletop sweeteners, electroplating brighteners, pharmaceuticals, etc. All forms of saccharin are within the scope of the present investigation. 4. The product under consideration is classified in Chapter 29 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 under customs subheading no. 29251100 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. However, Customs classifications are indicative only and in no way binding on the scope of th is investigation. 5. The applicants have not proposed any PCNs in the present application. The Authority has observed fluctuations in the unit price of the product under consideration. The interested parties may offer their comments/submissions on the PUC/ PC N, if any, within thirty days from the date of date of initiation of this investigation. B. LIKE ARTICLE 6. The applicants have claimed that the goods produced by the domestic industry are like articles to the subject good originating in or exported from China P R. It has been stated that the article produced by the applicants and that imported from China PR are comparable in terms of physical and chemical characteristics, manufacturing process and technology, functions and uses, product specifications of the subj ect goods. The subject goods and the article manufactured by the applicants are technically and commercially substitutable. The applicants have claimed that consumers are using the subject goods and the article manufactured by the applicants interchangeabl y. Thus, for the purpose of the present investigation, the subject goods produced by the domestic industry is being treated as ‘like article’ of the subject goods imported from China PR. C. DOMESTIC INDUSTRY AND STANDING 7. The application has been filed by Swat i Petro Products Ltd. and Blue Jet Healthcare Ltd. There are two other producers producing subject goods, namely, A. S. Chemopharma Pvt. Ltd. and Shree Vardayini Chemical Industries Pvt Ltd. 8. As per the evidence available on record, production of the appli cants accounts for “major proportion” of total Indian production. Further, the applicants have not imported the subject goods from the subject country nor are they related to any the importer or the exporter of the subject goods. In view of the above, the Authority notes prima facie that the applicants constitute an eligible domestic industry in terms of Rule 2 (b), and the application satisfies the criteria of standing in terms of Rule 5(3) of the Rules supra . D. SUBJECT COUNTRIES 9. The subject country for the present investigation is China PR. E. PERIOD OF INVESTIGATION 10. The period of investigation (POI) in the present investigation is October 2022 - September 2023 (12 months). The injury investigation period has been considered as the period of investigation and 2020 -21, 2021 -22, and 2022 -23. F. BASIS OF ALLEGED DUMPING a. Normal Value 11. The applicants have claimed that China PR should be treated as a non -market economy and the normal value should be determined in terms of Rule — 7 of Annexure I of the Rules. The applican ts have cited Para 8(2) of Annexure -I of the Rules and have stated that the Chinese producers should be directed to demonstrate that market economy conditions prevail in the industry producing the subject goods in terms Para 8(3) of Annexure -I of the Rules . The applicants have claimed that for China PR, normal value should be determined in accordance with para 7 and 8 of Annexure I of the Rules. 12. The normal value, for the purpose of initiation of the investigation, has been constructed based on the best estimates of the cost of the production of the domestic industry of the subject goods as per the best information available after duly adjusting the selling, general and administrative expenses with reasonable profits. b. Export Price 13. The export price for the sub ject goods has been computed based on the Directorate General of Systems & Data Management transaction -wise import data. Appropriate price adjustments have been claimed to make the prices at ex -factory levels so that they become comparable with the normal value. c. Dumping Margin 14. The normal value and the export price have been compared at the ex -factory level, which prima facie establishes that the dumping margin is above the de minimi s level and is significant with respect to the product under consideration f rom the subject country. Thus, there is sufficient prima facie evidence that the product under consideration from the subject country is being dumped in the domestic market of India by the exporters from the subject country. G. ALLEGATION OF INJURY AND CAUSAL LINK 15. The applicants have provided prima facie evidence with respect to the injury suffered by the domestic industry because of the dumped imports. The volume of the subject imports from the subject country has increased in both absolute as well as in rela tive terms. The capacity utilization of the domestic industry has declined. The price depression caused by the dumped imports have been preventing the domestic industry from increasing its prices to recover the full cost and achieve reasonable rate of retu rns. The subject imports have an adverse impact on the profitability parameters of the domestic industry due to which the domestic industry is earning negative returns in the POI. There has also been an increase in the inventory levels of the domestic indu stry. Thus, the evidence provided by the applicants, prima facie shows injury to the domestic industry caused by the alleged dumped imports from China PR. H. INITIATION OF THE INVESTIGATION 16. On the basis of the duly substantiated application by the domestic in dustry, and having satisfied itself, on the basis of prima faci e evidence submitted by the applicants substantiating the dumping and consequent injury to the domestic industry, the Authority hereby initiates an anti -dumping investigation into the alleged d umping and consequent material injury to the domestic industry in accordance with Section 9A of the Act read with Rule 5 of the Rules, to determine the existence, degree, and effect of alleged dumping and to recommend the amount of dumping duty, which if l evied would be adequate to remove the injury to the domestic industry. I. SUBMISSION OF INFORMATION 17. All communication should be sent to the Authority via email at the email adg16 [email protected] , adv13 - [email protected] , [email protected] and dd17 [email protected] . It should be ensured that the narrative part of the submission is in searchable PDF/MS Word format and data files are in MS Excel format. 18. The known producers/exporters from the subject country, their government through their embassy in India, the importers and users in India known to be concerned with the subject goods and the domestic producers are being informed separately to enable them to file all the relevant information in the form and manner prescribed within the time -limit set out below. 19. Any other interested party may also make its submissions relevant to the investigation in the form and manner prescribed within the time -limit set out below on the email addresses mentioned hereinabove. 20. Any party making any confidential submission before the Authority is required to make a non -confidential version of the same available to the other interested parties . 21. Interested parties are further advised to keep a regular watch on the official website of the Authority http://www.dgtr.gov.in/ for any updated information with respect to this investigation. J. TIME LIMIT 22. Any info rmation relating to the present investigation should be sent to the Authority via email at the email addresses adg16 [email protected] , adv13 [email protected] , [email protected] and dd17 [email protected] within thirty days (30 days) from the date of receipt of the notice as per Rule 6(4) of the ADD Rules. It may, however, be noted that in terms of explanation of th e said Rule, the notice calling for information and other documents shall be deemed to have been received within one week from the date on which it was sent by the Designated Authority or transmitted to the appropriate diplomatic representative of the expo rting country. If no information is received within the prescribed time limit or the information received is incomplete, the Authority may record its finding on the basis of the facts available on records in accordance with the Rules. 23. All the interested pa rties are hereby advised to intimate their interest (including the nature of interest) in the instant investigation and file their questionnaire response/submissions within the above time limit. K. SUBMISSION OF INFORMATION ON CONFIDENTIAL BASIS 24. Any party mak ing any confidential submission or providing information on confidential basis before the Authority, is required to simultaneously submit a non -confidential version of the same in terms of Rule 8(2) of the Rules and the Trade Notices issued in this regard. Failure to adhere to the above may lead to rejection of the response/ submissions. 25. The parties making any submission (including Appendices/ Annexures attached thereto), before the Authority including questionnaire response, are required to file confidenti al and non - confidential versions separately. 26. The "confidential" or "non -confidential" submissions must be clearly marked as "confidential" or "non - confidential" at the top of each page. Any submission made without such marking shall be treated as non - confidential by the Authority, and the Authority shall be at liberty to allow the other interested parties to inspect such submissions. 27. The confidential version shall contain all information which is by nature confidential and/or other information which the su pplier of such information claims as confidential. For information which is claimed to be confidential by nature or the information on which confidentiality is claimed because of other reasons, the supplier of the information is required to provide a good cause statement along with the supplied information as to why such information cannot be disclosed. 28. The non -confidential version of the information filed by the interested parties should be a replica of the confidential version with the confidential inform ation preferably indexed or blanked out (where indexation is not possible) and such information must be appropriately and adequately summarized depending upon the information on which confidentiality is claimed. 29. The non -confidential summary must be in suff icient detail to permit a reasonable understanding of the substance of the information furnished on a confidential basis. However, in exceptional circumstances, the party submitting the confidential information may indicate that such information is not sus ceptible to summary and a statement of reasons containing a sufficient and adequate explanation in terms of Rule 8 of the Rules, 1995, and appropriate trade notices issued by the Authority, as to why such summarization is not possible, must be provided to the satisfaction of the Authority. 30. The interested parties can offer their comments on the aforementioned email addresses on the issues of confidentiality claimed by the interested parties within 7 days from the date of circulation of the non - confidential v ersion of the documents. 31. Any submission made without a meaningful non -confidential version thereof or a sufficient and adequate cause statement in terms of Rule 8 of the Rules, and appropriate trade notices issued by the Authority, on the confidentiality c laim shall not be taken on record by the Authority. 32. The Authority may accept or reject the request for confidentiality on examination of the nature of the information submitted. If the Authority is satisfied the request for confidentiality is not warranted or if the supplier of the information is either unwilling to make the information public or to authorize its disclosure in generalized or in summary form, it may. disregard such information. L. INSPECTION OF PUBLIC FILE 33. A list of registered interested partie s will be uploaded on the DGTR's website along with the request therein to all of them to email the non -confidential version of their submissions/response/information to all other interested parties. Failure to circulate non - confidential version of submis sions/response/information might lead to consideration of an interested parry as non -cooperative. M. NON - COOPERATION 34. In case where an interested party refuses access to, or otherwise does not provide necessary information within a reasonable period, or sign ificantly impedes the investigation, the Authority may record its findings on the basis of the facts available to it and make such recommendations to the Central Government as deemed fit. ANANT SWARUP, Designated Authority Uploaded by Dte. o f Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi -110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi -110054.

Never miss important gazettes

Create a free account to save gazettes, add notes, and get email alerts for keywords you care about.

Sign Up Free