Gazette Tracker
Gazette Tracker

Core Purpose

The Directorate General of Trade Remedies initiates an anti-dumping investigation concerning imports of "Copper Data Cables" originating in or exported from the People's Republic of China.

Detailed Summary

The Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Department of Commerce, through its Directorate General of Trade Remedies (Designated Authority), initiated an anti-dumping investigation on September 18, 2025 (Case No. AD (OI) 39/2025) regarding imports of "Copper Data Cables" from the People's Republic of China. This action follows an application by Birla Cable Limited and Sterlite Technologies Limited (the Applicants/Domestic Industry), who alleged material injury due to dumped imports and requested anti-dumping duties. The product under consideration includes all structured Copper Data Cables such as CAT 5e, CAT 6, CAT 6A, CAT 7, CAT 7A, and patch cords, primarily used for high-speed data transmission in LANs, and classified under HS Codes 854449. The investigation is based on prima facie evidence of dumping and material injury to the domestic industry, including increased imports, price suppression, and adverse impacts on profitability, cash profits, and return on capital employed over the injury period (FY 2021-22, FY 2022-23, FY 2023-2024, and the POI). The Period of Investigation (POI) is 1st April 2024 to 31st March 2025. The initiation is in accordance with Section 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and Rule 5 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995 (AD Rules, 1995). Interested parties are directed to submit information within 30 days of the non-confidential application's circulation, adhering to Rules 6 and 7 of the AD Rules, 1995 regarding confidentiality, and communications should be sent to dd17-dgtr@gov.in and dd16-dgtr@gov.in. Siddharth Mahajan is the Designated Authority.

Full Text

REGD. No. D. L.-33004/99 The Gazette of India CG-DL-E-22092025-266281 EXTRAORDINARY PART I-Section 1 PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY No. 249] NEW DELHI, THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 18, 2025/BHADRA 27, 1947s MINISTRY OF COMMERCE & INDUSTRY (DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE) (Directorate General of Trade Remedies) INITIATION NOTIFICATION Case No. AD (ΟΙ) 39/2025 New Delhi, the 18th September, 2025 Subject: Initiation of Anti-dumping Investigation concerning imports of "Copper Data Cables" originating in or exported from the People's Republic of China. F.No. 6/44/2025 DGTR.–1. Having regards to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, as amended from time to time (hereinafter also referred to as the "Act") and the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995, as amended from time to time (hereinafter also referred to as the "AD Rules, 1995"), Birla Cable Limited and Sterlite Technologies Limited (hereinafter referred to as the "Applicants"), has filed an application before the Designated Authority (hereinafter referred to as the "Authority") seeking initiation of anti-dumping investigation concerning imports of "Copper Data Cables" (hereinafter also referred to as "Subject Goods"), from the People's Republic of China. 2. The applicants have alleged that subject good originating in or exported from the People's Republic of China has caused material injury to the domestic industry. Accordingly, the Applicants have requested for the imposition of anti-dumping duties on the imports of subject goods from the aforementioned country. A. PRODUCT UNDER CONSIDERATION 3. The product under consideration (hereinafter referred to as "PUC") in the present investigation is “all structured Copper Data Cables including CAT 5e, CAT 6, CAT 6A, CAT 7, CAT 7A and patch cords (hereinafter also referred to as "subject goods"). Copper Data Cable usually comprise of twisted pairs of copper conductors, insulated with polyethylene or other sheathing material, with or without the inclusion of braiding, drain wire, individual and/or overall foil shield, and a separator, used for the transmission of data and signals over local area networks (“LAN”). It includes both shielded and unshielded data cables, which are further categorized based on their performance such as CAT 5e, CAT 6, CAT 6A, CAT 7, CAT 7A and Patch Cord. Copper Data Cables are primarily used as LAN cables for high-speed data transmission, telecommunications, networking, audio-video transmission, etc. 4. The subject goods are classified under Chapter 85 titled " Electrical machinery and equipment and parts thereof; sound recorders and reproducers, television image and sound recorders and reproducers, and parts and accessories of such articles" under HS Codes 854449. The customs heading is indicative only and is not binding upon the scope of the PUC. 5. The parties to the present investigation may provide their comments on the scope of the PUC and propose PCNs, if any, within 15 days of the initiation of this investigation. B. LIKE ARTICLE 6. The applicants have claimed that there are no known differences in the subject goods manufactured by applicants and the subject goods imported from the People's Republic of China. The subject goods are comparable in terms of physical and chemical characteristics, functions and uses, and distribution and marketing. The subject goods are technically and commercially substitutable. Consumers have used and are using the goods interchangeably. Thus, for the purpose of the present investigation, the subject goods produced by the applicants and the subject goods imported from the People's Republic of China are being treated as 'like article' to each other. C. DOMESTIC INDUSTRY AND STANDING 7. The present application has been filed by Birla Cable Limited (hereinafter referred to as "BCL") and Sterlite Technologies Limited (hereinafter referred to as "STL"), hereinafter collectively referred to as the "applicant producers". The applicant producers have not imported subject goods from the subject country during the POI. 8. On the basis of the information available on record, the Authority has satisfied itself that the applicant producers constitute domestic industry in terms of Rule 2(b) of AD Rules, 1995. Further, the application also satisfies the requirements of standing in terms of Rule 5(3) of AD Rules, 1995. D. SUBJECT COUNTRY 9. The subject country in the present investigation is the People's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as "China PR"). E. PERIOD OF INVESTIGATION ("POI") 10. The POI for the present investigation is 1st April 2024 to 31st March 2025 (12 months). The injury period for the investigation will cover the periods FY 2021-22, FY 2022-23, FY 2023-2024 and the POI. F. BASIS OF DUMPING i. Normal value 11. The applicants have submitted that China PR should be treated as a non-market economy and that producers from China PR should be directed to demonstrate that market economy conditions prevail in the industry with regard to the production and sales of the subject goods. Unless the producers from China PR show that such market economy conditions prevail, their normal value should be determined in accordance with Para 7 of Annexure-I to the Anti-Dumping Rules, 1995. 12. The applicants have stated that subject goods do not have dedicated HS code and therefore, they could not rely on third country export prices for determination of normal value. Therefore, for the purpose of initiation of this investigation, the normal value has been constructed based on the estimates of the cost of production of the applicants duly adjusted with selling, general and administrative expenses, along with a reasonable profit margin. ii. Export Price 13. The applicants have claimed CIF export price based on market intelligence. The Authority has considered import price based on DG Systems data. Adjustments on account of freight, insurance, commission, port expenses and bank charges were made to arrive at ex-factory export price. iii. Dumping margin 14. Upon comparison of normal value and the export price at ex-factory level it is prima facie noted that the dumping margin is above de minimis level and is also significant. There is prima facie evidence that the product under consideration is being dumped into the Indian market by the exporters from the subject country. G. Injury and Causal link 15. Information furnished by the applicants, with regard to various parameters, has been considered for assessment of injury to the domestic industry. The applicants have provided prima facie information with respect to the injury suffered by the domestic industry because of dumped imports. There has been a significant increase in imports from the subject country in absolute and relative terms. The applicants have claimed that the imports have suppressed and depressed the prices of the domestic industry. The subject imports have entered at prices below the cost of sales and selling price of the domestic industry. This has adversely impacted the performance of the domestic industry in respect of profitability. The cash profits of the domestic industry has declined over the injury period and it has earned a low return on capital employed. The market share of the subject imports has increased and that of the domestic industry has declined. Based on the above, the Authority notes that there is sufficient prima facie evidence of material injury being caused to the domestic industry by the dumped imports from the subject country, justifying initiation of an anti-dumping investigation. H. INITIATION OF ANTI-DUMPING INVESTIGATION 16. The subject country was intimated prior to the initiation of the investigation in terms of Rule 5(5) of AD Rules, 1995. 17. On the basis of the duly substantiated written application submitted by the applicants, and having reached satisfaction based on prima facie evidence submitted by the applicants concerning dumping of the PUC originating in or exported from the subject country, the consequential injury to the domestic industry and causal link between such injury and the dumped imports, and in accordance with Section 9A of the Act read with Rule 5 of the AD Rules, 1995 the Authority, hereby, initiates an anti-dumping investigation to determine the existence, degree and effect of the dumping with respect to the product under consideration originating in or exported from the subject country and to recommend the appropriate amount of the anti-dumping duty, which if levied, would be adequate to remove the injury to the domestic industry. I. PROCEDURE 18. The provisions of Rules 6 of the AD Rules, 1995 shall be followed in this investigation. J. SUBMISSION OF INFORMATION 19. All communication should be sent to the Designated Authority via email at email addresses dd17- dgtr@gov.in and dd16-dgtr@gov.in with a copy to adv13-dgtr@gov.in and consultant-dgtr@nic.in. It must be ensured that the narrative part of the submission is in searchable PDF/MS-Word format and data files are in MS Excel format. 20. The known producers/exporters in the subject country, the Government of the subject country through its Embassy in India, the importers and users in India who are known to be associated with the subject goods are being informed separately to enable them to file all the relevant information within the time limits mentioned in this initiation notification. All such information must be filed in the form and manner as prescribed in this initiation notification, the AD Rules, 1995 and the applicable trade notices issued by the Authority. 21. Any other interested party may also make submission relevant to the present investigation in the form and manner as prescribed in this initiation notification, the AD Rules, 1995 and the applicable trade notices issued by the Authority within the time limits mentioned in this initiation notification. 22. Any party making any confidential submission before the Authority is required to make a non- confidential version of the same available to the other interested parties. 23. Interested parties are further directed to regularly visit the official website of the Directorate General of Trade Remedies (https://www.dgtr.gov.in/) to stay updated and apprised with the information as well as the further process related to the investigation. K. TIME LIMIT 24. Any information relating to the present investigation should be sent to the Authority via email at email address dd17-dgtr@gov.in and dd16-dgtr@gov.in with a copy to adv13-dgtr@gov.in and consultant- dgtr@nic.in within 30 days from the date on which the non-confidential version of the application filed by the domestic industry would be circulated by the Authority or transmitted to the appropriate diplomatic representative of the exporting countries as per Rule 6(4) of the AD Rules, 1995. If no information is received within the stipulated time limit or the information received is incomplete, the Authority may record its findings based on the facts available on record and in accordance with the AD Rules, 1995. 25. All the interested parties are hereby advised to communicate their interest (including the nature of interest) in the instant matter and file their questionnaire responses within the time limit as stipulated in this notification. 26. Where an interested party seeks additional time for filing of submissions, it must mention sufficient cause for such extension in terms of Rule 6 (4) of the AD Rules, 1995 and such request must come within the time stipulated in this initiation notification. L. SUBMISSION OF INFORMATION ON CONFIDENTIAL BASIS 27. Where any party to the present investigation makes confidential submissions or provides information on a confidential basis before the Authority, it is required to simultaneously submit a non-confidential version of such information in terms of Rule 7(2) of the AD Rules, 1995 and in accordance with the relevant trade notices issued by the Authority in this regard. 28. Such submissions must be clearly marked as "confidential" or "non-confidential" at the top of each page. Any submission which has been made to the Authority without such markings shall be treated as "non-confidential" information by the Authority, and the Authority shall be at liberty to allow other interested parties to inspect such submissions. 29. The non-confidential version of the information filed by the interested parties should essentially be a replica of the confidential version with the confidential information preferably indexed or blanked out (where indexation is not possible) and such information must be appropriately and adequately summarized depending upon the information on which confidentiality is claimed. 30. The confidential version shall contain all information which is by nature confidential and/or other information which the supplier of such information claims as confidential. For information which is claimed to be confidential by nature or the information on which confidentiality is claimed because of other reasons, the supplier of the information is required to provide a good cause statement along with the supplied information as to why such information cannot be disclosed. 31. The Authority may accept or reject the request for confidentiality on examination of the nature of the information submitted. If the Authority is satisfied that the request for confidentiality is not warranted or if the supplier of the information is either unwilling to make the information public or to authorize its disclosure in generalized or summary form, it may disregard such information. 32. The non-confidential summary must be in sufficient detail to permit a reasonable understanding of the substance of the information furnished on confidential basis. However, in exceptional circumstances, the party submitting the confidential information may indicate that such information is not susceptible to summary, and a statement of reasons containing a sufficient and adequate explanation in terms of Rule 7 of the AD Rules, 1995 and appropriate trade notices issued by the Authority, as to why such summarization is not possible, must be provided to the satisfaction of the Authority. 33. The interested parties can offer their comments on the issues of confidentiality claimed by the domestic industry within 7 days of the receipt of the non-confidential version of the application. 34. Any submission made without a meaningful non-confidential version thereof or without a sufficient and adequate cause statement in terms of Rule 7 of the AD Rules, 1995 and appropriate trade notices issued by the Authority, on the confidentiality claim shall not be taken on record by the Authority. M. INSPECTION OF PUBLIC FILE 35. A list of registered interested parties will be uploaded on the DGTR's website along with the request therein to all of them to email the non-confidential version of their submissions to all other interested parties. Failure to circulate non-confidential version of submissions/response/ information might lead to consideration of an interested party as non-cooperative. N. NON-COOPERATION 36. In case any interested party refuses access to and otherwise does not provide necessary information within a reasonable period or within the time stipulated by the Authority in this initiation notification, or significantly impedes the investigation, the Authority may declare such interested party as non- cooperative and record its findings based on the facts available and make such recommendations to the Central Government as deemed fit. SIDDHARTH MAHAJAN, Designated Authority

Never miss important gazettes

Create a free account to save gazettes, add notes, and get email alerts for keywords you care about.

Sign Up Free